United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Pedro Serrano-maldonado, Defendant-appellant, 107 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Appellant appeals the district court's denial of his motion for nationwide discovery on his selective prosecution claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Appellant makes precisely the same argument and offers precisely the same evidence in support of his motion as we rejected in United States v. Candia-Veleta, 1996 WL 737418 (9th Cir. Dec. 27, 1996). Candia-Veleta is controlling. Accordingly, the district court's denial of the appellant's motion is
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
