United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Cipriano Silvas Padilla, Defendant-appellant, 106 F.3d 410 (9th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 106 F.3d 410 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted Jan. 21, 1997. *Decided Jan. 23, 1997

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Cipriano Silvas-Padilla appeals his sentence imposed after his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) (2). He contends that the district court erred by imposing a sentence at the high end of his Sentencing Guidelines range and by denying him a three-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. In his plea agreement, Silvas-Padilla waived "any right to raise on appeal or collaterally attack any matter pertaining to this prosecution and sentence if the sentence imposed is consistent with the terms of this agreement." The plea agreement specifically stated that "there is no agreement regarding acceptance of responsibility." It made no provision regarding sentencing within the guidelines range. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Baramdyka, 95 F.3d 840, 843 (9th Cir. 1996).

DISMISSED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.