Eudene H. Donald, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bradford & Co., Incorporated, F/k/a J.c. Bradford & Co.,incorporated, Defendant-appellee,james Reynolds; Rudy S. Hogan, Defendants, 106 F.3d 400 (6th Cir. 1997)

Plaintiff, Eudene Donald, appeals from the order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendant, Bradford & Co., in her action alleging age discrimination in the workplace.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are satisfied that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment for the defendant. The reasoning in support of judgment for the defendant has been well articulated by the district court in its complete and carefully written opinion. A reiteration of the district court's reasoning would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated by the Honorable R. Allan Edgar in his opinion dated September 20, 1995.