Bernard Schoninger Shopping Centers, Ltd., Plaintiff-appellee, v. Kmart Corporation, Defendant-appellant, 105 F.3d 659 (6th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 105 F.3d 659 (6th Cir. 1997) Jan. 9, 1997

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge, KEITH and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Kmart Corporation appeals from the judgment for plaintiff following a jury trial and the denial of its motions for summary judgment, judgment as a matter of law, and new trial in this diversity action for breach of contract.

We have carefully reviewed the record in this case, including the trial court's written opinions denying summary judgment and denying judgment as a matter of law. Although we can say that we might not have viewed the case exactly as the trial court did, we cannot say that the jury's verdict and judgments of the trial court resulted from reversible error.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Chief Judge MARTIN would reverse.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.