United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Carlos Palomino Guerrero, A/k/a Nicholas Palomino,defendant-appellant, 103 F.3d 142 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 103 F.3d 142 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. *Decided Dec. 06, 1996

Before: SNEED, TROTT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Carlos Palomino Guerrero appeals his jury conviction and the sentence imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines for possession with intent to distribute marijuana and methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. His counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified no issues for appellate review, and Guerrero has not filed a supplemental pro se brief raising any issues.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court is AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.