David M. Simms, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charles Hall, Magistrate, Defendant-appellee, 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: June 7, 1993. Decided: June 24, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-679-R)

David M. Simms, Appellant Pro Se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

David M. Simms appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).*  Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Simms v. Hall, No. CA-92-679-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.