United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Robert Sanchez Ortega, Defendant-appellant, 995 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 995 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1993) Submitted May 12, 1993. *Decided May 27, 1993

Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Robert Sanchez Ortega appeals his 120-month sentence after a guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) (1), 846. Despite a negotiated plea agreement in which Ortega expressly waived his right to appeal, he contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence based upon a 1973 state conviction which resulted from an invalid guilty plea. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

" [A]n express waiver of the right to appeal in a negotiated plea of guilty is valid if knowingly and voluntarily made." United States v. Bolinger, 940 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir. 1991).

Here, the government argues that Ortega waived the right to appeal his sentence based upon his written plea agreement. We agree. Ortega's plea agreement provides in relevant part that " [t]he defendant waives his right to appeal his conviction and sentence unless his sentence exceeds 10 years." There is no indication in the record that Ortega's plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made. Thus, because Ortega's sentence did not exceed 10 years, he waived his right to appeal. See Bolinger, 940 F.2d at 480.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.