Buddy Dooley, Petitioner, v. B & B Coal Company; Old Republic Insurance Company;director, Office of Workers' Compensationprograms, United States Department Oflabor, Respondents, 995 F.2d 1062 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 995 F.2d 1062 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: February 1, 1993Decided: June 11, 1993

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (90-181-BLA)

Buddy Dooley, Petitioner Pro Se.

Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, Arter & Hadden, Washington, D.C.; Barbara J. Johnson, Matthew P. Levin, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Buddy Dooley submitted his Petition for Review of the denial of his request for black lung benefits to the Benefits Review Board within the applicable sixty-day appeal period, 33 U.S.C. § 921(c) (1988), incorporated by reference into 30 U.S.C. § 932(a) (1988), but notice was not forwarded to this Court until after the appeal period had expired. Consequently, this Court is without jurisdiction to hear this petition. Adkins v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, 889 F.2d 1360, 1361 (4th Cir. 1989). We therefore grant the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Appeal.*  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 *

We note that our dismissal of Dooley's Petition for Review does not prejudice his right to file a new claim if the deputy commissioner finds a "material change in conditions." 20 C.F.R.s 725.309(d) (1992)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.