United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Horace Anthony Thompson, Defendant-appellant, 993 F.2d 229 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-138-6)
Horace Anthony Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.
William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Horace Anthony Thompson appeals from the district court's order that denied his motion for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (2) (West Supp. 1992). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thompson, No. CR-92-138-6 (D.S.C. Jan. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
