S. Archer Green; Philip D. Hightower; Theodore T.fountain; Lawrence M. Fountain; Jan R. Goergen;robert Fletcher; James Ramey,plaintiffs and Defendants Oncounterclaim-appellees, v. Stewart T. Smythe, Defendant and Plaintiff on Counterclaim-appellant,ironsides, Inc., Defendant on Counterclaim-appellee, 993 F.2d 1546 (6th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 993 F.2d 1546 (6th Cir. 1993) May 7, 1993

Before MILBURN, RYAN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Stewart T. Smythe, a Kentucky resident, appeals pro se from a district court order granting plaintiffs' motion to voluntarily dismiss their complaint. This case has been referred to a panel of the court for initial review of appellate jurisdiction.

This securities and civil diversity action originated in a dispute between the parties over control and ownership of a Kentucky corporation. Plaintiffs filed the original complaint, and Smythe responded with a counterclaim. Plaintiffs were granted summary judgment on all counts of the counterclaim, and that result was affirmed on appeal to this court. Plaintiffs then moved for and were granted voluntary dismissal of their complaint.

Upon consideration, it is concluded that Smythe lacks standing to contest the voluntary dismissal of plaintiffs' complaint, as he was not aggrieved by the order. See Native Village of Tyonek v. Puckett, 957 F.2d 631, 633 (9th Cir. 1992). To the extent that Smythe is attacking the disposition of his counterclaim, such issues are not properly before the court as they have been previously ruled on in earlier appeals to this court.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 8(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.