United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Soloman Ham, A/k/a Solomon Hamm, A/k/a Charles R. Brewer,defendant-appellant, 993 F.2d 1540 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-90-53-N, CA-92-510-2)
Soloman Ham, Appellant Pro Se.
Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Soloman Ham appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Ham, Nos. CR-90-53-N, CA-92-510-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We deny Ham's motion for appointment of counsel but grant his motion to expedite his appeal to the extent possible given the Court's workload
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
