Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.lisa L. Safar, Social Security No. 508-02-6388, Appellant, v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.d., Secretary of Health and Humanservices, Appellee, 989 F.2d 505 (8th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 989 F.2d 505 (8th Cir. 1993) Submitted: March 19, 1993. Filed: April 1, 1993

Before BOWMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and KYLE,*  District Judge.

PER CURIAM.


Lisa L. Safar appeals the judgment of the District Court1  affirming the Secretary's denial of her claim for Supplemental Security Income. The denial of benefits was on the ground that she was not disabled as defined in the Social Security Act.

For reversal, Safar contends that the Administrative Law Judge erred (1) in finding her testimony regarding the severity of her headaches not credible, (2) by not giving more weight to the opinion of her treating physician, and (3) in finding that her non-exertional impairments did not significantly affect her ability to perform substantial gainful activity.

Having carefully considered the administrative record as well as the briefs and arguments of the parties, we conclude that no error of law appears and that the decision of the Secretary is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. We also conclude that an opinion would have no precedential value.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is summarily AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

 *

*The HONORABLE RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation

 1

The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.