Curtis D. Shuler, Plaintiff-appellant, v. L. v. Stephenson; M. J. Mcdade; Odis Temple; Williesurpes; J. C. Meno; Michael Rawls, Defendants-appellees, 989 F.2d 494 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-335-CRT-F)
Curtis D. Shuler, Appellant Pro Se.
James Peeler Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Neil Clark Dalton, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Curtis D. Shuler appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shuler v. Stephenson, No. CA-91-335-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. June 17, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
