Mark Jones Lamona, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Martin Donalson, Jr., Defendant-appellee,andjim Dooley; Leslie Coleman; Steve Salmon, Defendants, 989 F.2d 493 (4th Cir. 1993)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 989 F.2d 493 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: March 1, 1993Decided: March 25, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-216-R)

Mark Jones Lamona, Appellant Pro Se.

Gary Elton Tegenkamp, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia; W. Carrington Thompson, Chatham, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Mark Jones Lamona appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).1  Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Lamona v. Donalson, No. CA-92-216-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 21, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.2 

AFFIRMED

 1

The parties consented to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2)

 2

Because Lamona's notice of appeal is timely under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), we deny Donalson's motion to dismiss the appeal

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.