Jane Doe, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Taylor Independent School District, et al., Defendants,mike Caplinger, in His Official Capacities and Eddylankford, in His Official and Individualcapacities, Defendants-appellants, 987 F.2d 231 (5th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseEric W. Schulze, Laurie Maniotis Rodriguez, Hairston, Walsh, Anderson, Underwood & Schulze, P.C., Austin, TX, for defendants-appellants.
Gwendolyn H. Gregory, August W. Steinhilber, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Nat'l School Boards Assoc., Alexandria, VA, for amicus-Nat'l School Boards Assoc.
David M. Feldman and Myra C. Schexnayder, Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Brian D. East, Ellen Hahn, Daves, Hahn & Levy, Vella M. Fink, B. Craig Deats, Van Os, Deats, Rubinett & Owen, P.C., Austin, TX, for M. Caplinger and E. Lankford.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Stephen H. Capelle, United States Magistrate Judge.
(Opinion October 2, 1992, 5 Cir., 1992, 975 F.2d 137)
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, E. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
