Walter Chavez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. O. Lane Mccotter, Individually and As Director at the Utahstate Prison; Todo Wantanabe; R. Trys; Officersorenson, Defendants-appellees.walter Chavez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. O. Lane Mccotter, Tamara Holden, Fred Hurst, Todo Wantanabe,r. Trys, Officer Sorenson, Utah State Prisonmedical Department Staff, Defendants-appellees.walter Chavez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Norman H. Bangerter, Governor; Dental Clinic; Gospollibrary, Defendants-appellees.walter Cupertino Chavez Alvarez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Tamara Holden, Warden, Utah State Prison, Defendant-appellee, 986 F.2d 1426 (10th Cir. 1993)

After examining the briefs and appellate records, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of these appeals. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cases are therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

In these four cases, the United States District Court for the District of Utah, on the Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, concluded that the claims included in Walter Chavez's almost incomprehensible pleadings lacked arguable bases either in law or in fact. The court thus provisionally dismissed those claims as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), provided that Chavez was granted either fifteen or twenty days to amend his pleadings to allege more facts. When Chavez failed to do so, judgment was entered against him in each case. Because we agree with the district court that Chavez's original pleadings lacked arguable bases in law or in fact, and because Chavez elected to forego the opportunity to supplement his inadequate pleadings, we find these appeals also to be frivolous and DISMISS under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). See Nietzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989). The mandate shall issue forthwith.