Leona F. Fass, Plaintiff-appellant v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary, Defendant-appellee, 981 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 981 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted Dec. 16, 1992. *Decided Dec. 23, 1992

Before HUG, PREGERSON and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

The issue in this case is whether the district court erred by dismissing Leona Fass's action for failure to effect time service upon the United States Attorney, pursuant to Rule 4(j), Fed. R. Civ. P. We affirm.

Rule 4(d) (4) requires a plaintiff suing a federal defendant to serve the Office of the United States Attorney with a copy of the summons and complaint. Rule 4(j) provides for dismissal without prejudice when a plaintiff fails to serve a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint without good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) (4), 4(j); A.W. Reynolds v. United States, 782 F.2d 837, 838 (9th Cir. 1986) (per curiam) (dismissal is appropriate under Rule 12(b) (2) for lack of personal jurisdiction). The plaintiff's failure to read the Rules of Civil Procedure does not constitute good cause. Id. The dismissal of Fass's action was not an abuse of discretion.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.