Robert Bennett, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Muriel April Bennett, Defendant,andstate of Nevada, Appellee, 981 F.2d 1257 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 981 F.2d 1257 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. Decided Dec. 3, 1992

Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Robert Bennett appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We construe the district court's dismissal of Bennett's complaint prior to service of process as a dismissal for frivolousness pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). See Jackson v. Arizona, 885 F.2d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 1989). We review for abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992). Frivolous in forma pauperis complaints may be dismissed sua sponte under section 1915(d). Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989). A complaint is frivolous "where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or fact." Id. at 325.

Here, Bennett filed a "Petition for Removal from State Courts" requesting that the district court review the decisions of the Nevada state and appellate courts in his divorce action. Bennett alleged that his constitutional rights were violated throughout the state proceedings. The district court found that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review Bennett's divorce action and that Bennett could not bring a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the state of Nevada.

Federal courts traditionally decline to exercise jurisdiction in domestic relations cases when the core issue involves the status of husband and wife. Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 112 S. Ct. 2206, 2215 (1992). Further, federal courts lack jurisdiction to review final decisions of state courts, even if plaintiff alleges that the state court's action was unconstitutional. Allah v. Superior Court, 871 F.2d 887, 890 (9th Cir. 1989). Finally, the eleventh amendment bars a suit against a state in federal court. Price v. Akaka, 928 F.2d 824, 828 (9th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 436 (1991). Thus, the district court properly dismissed Bennett's action.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.