Davey James Reedy, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the City of Roanoke; Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendants-appellees.davey James Reedy, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Augusta Correctional Center; Virginia Department Ofcorrections, Defendants-appellees.davey James Reedy, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Buckingham Correctional Center; Virginia Department Ofcorrections, Defendants-appellees, 981 F.2d 1251 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge.
Davey James Reedy, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Davey James Reedy appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reedy v. City of Roanoke, No. CA-92-665-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 28, 1992); Reedy v. Augusta Correctional Center, No. CA-92-754-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1992); Reedy v. Buckingham Correctional Center, No. CA-92-756-R (W.D. Va. Sep. 29, 1992). We deny Reedy's Motion to Amend and his "Motion of Advisement." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
