Andre C. Derrington-bey, Appellant, v. Benny O. Hodges; District of Columbia Department of Corrections, 978 F.2d 744 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 978 F.2d 744 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Sept. 23, 1992

Before BUCKLEY, SENTELLE and KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of appellee's response to this court's July 7, 1992 order to show cause, and the motion for appointment of counsel, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, that the district court's order, filed October 17, 1991, be vacated and the case remanded for the district court to consider whether appellant's imprisonment tolled the statute of limitations on his claims. See Hardin v. Straub, 490 U.S. 536, 543-44 (1989); D.C.Code Ann. § 12-302(a) (3) (1989 Repl.). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be dismissed as moot.

The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith a certified copy of this order to the district court in lieu of formal mandate.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.