United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Hugo Navejar-mladosich, Defendant-appellee, 977 F.2d 593 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 977 F.2d 593 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted Oct. 8, 1992. *Decided Oct. 13, 1992

Before D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

United States v. Proa-Tovar, No. 90-50373, slip op. 11085 (9th Cir. Sept. 14, 1992) (en banc), controls this case. Accordingly, the decision of the district court is reversed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with Proa-Tovar.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.