Marcus William Player, Plaintiff-appellant, v. B.j. Bunnell; J.w. Harkness; P. Burgess; W. Panzer,defendants-appellees, 977 F.2d 590 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 977 F.2d 590 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted Sept. 22, 1992. *Decided Sept. 30, 1992

Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Marcus W. Player appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motions to compel discovery and to continue his trial date. This court lacks jurisdiction over Player's appeal because the district court has neither entered a final order nor certified the interlocutory orders pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). See City of Las Vegas v. Foley, 747 F.2d 1294, 1297 (9th Cir. 1984) (discovery order is interlocutory and non-appealable); see also, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292(b). Accordingly, we dismiss Player's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.