United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jerome A. Susskind (91-1003), James J. Rumler (91-1004),scott Nickerson (91-1005), Defendants-appellants, 975 F.2d 1206 (6th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 975 F.2d 1206 (6th Cir. 1992) Sept. 4, 1992

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SURHREINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and these cases are restored to the docket as pending appeals.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule the cases for oral argument as soon as practicable.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.