William Ernest Howard, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Dr. Henry Ozinal, S.c.c. Doctor; Sandra M. Early, Reg.nurse; John Doe, S.c.c. Medical Staff; Jane Doe,s.c.c. Medical Staff, Defendants-appellees,andjohn B. Taylor, Warden, Defendant, 974 F.2d 1331 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseWilliam Ernest Howard, Appellant Pro Se.
Colin James Steuart Thomas, III, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, P.C., Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
William Ernest Howard appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Howard v. Ozinal, No. CA-91-282-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 21, 1991 & May 19, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.