In Re: Woodrow W. Williams; Geraldine Williams, Debtors.woodrow W. Williams; Geraldine Williams,plaintiff-appellants. v. Brian R. Seeber; Sherwin Turk; Rashel Turk, Defendants-appellees, 972 F.2d 345 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 972 F.2d 345 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: June 30, 1992Decided: July 30, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-90-1904-MJG; BK-87-4-93-SD)

Woodrow W. Williams, Geraldine Williams, Appellants Pro Se.

Brian R. Seeber, Gins & Seeber, P.C., Washington, D.C.; William Henry Roberge, Jr., Selzer & Roberge, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

D. Md.

Affirmed.

Before SPROUSE, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Woodrow and Geraldine Williams appeal the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's dismissal of an adversary proceeding arising out of the foreclosure on the Williams's residence in Potomac, Maryland. Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Seeber, No. CA-90-1904-MJG, BK-87-4-93-SD (D. Md., July 29, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.