In Re: Alfred J. Vincent, Petitioner, 972 F.2d 344 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 972 F.2d 344 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: June 18, 1992Decided: July 29, 1992

Alfred J. Vincent, Petitioner Pro Se.

Dismissed.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Dr. Alfred Vincent filed this mandamus petition seeking an order directing that Judge Maxwell recuse himself. The petition also sought to stay the remand to state court of an action removed to federal court by Dr. Vincent's wife. The motion for stay was denied by earlier order. One of Dr. Vincent's patients has also submitted a motion for injunctive relief.

An order remanding a case to state court as improvidently removed is not reviewable by appeal or mandamus. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (1988); Gravitt v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 430 U.S. 723, 723-24 (1977). Moreover, as the case has been remanded, and that remand is unreviewable, the issue of whether Judge Maxwell should have recused himself before remanding the case is not a live issue. We note, however, that there is no showing of extrajudicial bias warranting recusal. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987).

Finding no basis for mandamus jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition, and also dismiss the request for injunction submitted by Dr. Vincent's patient. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

DISMISSED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.