Daniel Edward Pruente, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert L. Tucker, Chairman, Arizona Board of Pardons Andparole, et al., Defendants-appellees, 972 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseBefore WRIGHT, FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Pruente appeals the dismissal of his section 1983 action against Arizona Parole Board officials and fictitiously named defendants. Members of the Parole Board are entitled to absolute immunity for actions taken with respect to parole hearings. Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981). Defendants under fictitious names are not proper defendants and must be dismisseD. Ariz. Local Rules of Fed.Prac. 10(d). We affirm for the reasons given by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.