United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ethel Delores Davis, Defendant-appellant, 967 F.2d 592 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 967 F.2d 592 (9th Cir. 1992) Argued and Submitted June 4, 1992. Decided July 10, 1992

Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM* 

Ethel Davis appeals the district court's revocation of her probation. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. Davis was required as a term of her probation to serve six months in a community treatment center ("CTC"), as well as to follow the rules and regulations imposed by the Probation Department. One of these rules was to follow the rules of the CTC, which required a subsistence payment of 25% of gross monthly income. Davis failed to make the subsistence payments. She also repeatedly failed to show indigency.

We find no abuse of discretion in the district court's decision to revoke probation. See United States v. Daly, 839 F.2d 598, 599 (9th Cir. 1988).

AFFIRMED.

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.