United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Angel Nolasco-cota, Defendant-appellee, 963 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1992)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 963 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted May 11, 1992. *Decided May 18, 1992

Before BOOCHEVER, REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

ORDER** 

For the reasons stated in United States v. Redondo-Lemos, 955 F.2d 1296 (9th Cir. 1992), the judgment of the district court is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Redondo-Lemos.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.