United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Clarence Bernardo Patterson, Defendant-appellant, 963 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1992)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 963 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted May 13, 1992. *Decided May 18, 1992

Before BOOCHEVER, REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Federal district courts have broad authority to revoke probation, and we will reverse such a decision only for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Laughlin, 933 F.2d 786, 788 (9th Cir. 1991). There was none here.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.