United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Robert Elizaha Dixon, Defendant-appellant, 963 F.2d 380 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 963 F.2d 380 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted May 4, 1992. *Decided May 13, 1992

Before JAMES R. BROWNING and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and CAUFIELD,**  District Judge.

MEMORANDUM*** 

Robert Dixon appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines for two counts of armed robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d), and one count of use of a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), his court-appointed attorney, Carol A. Klauschie, has filed a brief stating that she finds no issues for review and requesting permission to withdraw. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 & n. 6 (1988), discloses no issues for review.

Klauschie's request is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.

 *

Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 the panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument

 **

The Honorable Barbara A. Caulfield, District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation

 ***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this Circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.