Dwight M. Sutton, Petitioner-appellant, v. Attorney General of the State of Maryland; State Ofmaryland, Respondents-appellees, 962 F.2d 7 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseDwight M. Sutton, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Valerie Johnston Smith, Office of The Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before SPROUSE, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Dwight M. Sutton appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Sutton v. Attorney General of Maryland, No. CA-903242-K (D. Md. Nov. 3, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We deny Sutton's request for an independent fingerprint examiner and his motions for discovery, awareness of error, and for the assistance of United States Marshals
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
