United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Robert Muegge, Defendant-appellant, 962 F.2d 15 (9th Cir. 1992)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 962 F.2d 15 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted May 5, 1992. *Decided May 8, 1992

Before HUG, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

David Robert Muegge appeals his conviction following a guilty plea to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and his 46-month sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Muegge's attorney has filed a brief stating that he finds no issues for review. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.

Accordingly, we GRANT to motion of Donald S. Frick, Esq., to withdraw as counsel of record and AFFIRM the district court's judgment.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.