Julius Martinez, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Denver Sheriff's Department; Career Service Authority;carlos Jackson; John B. Palmer; John Simonet;dixie Grimes; Rex Freburg; Frankgassman; City of Denver,defendants-appellees, 955 F.2d 49 (10th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseBefore SEYMOUR and STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and OWEN,* District Judge.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT**
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Julius Martinez appeals from a summary judgment granted by the district court in favor of the named defendants. He contends that "the decision of the district court to dismiss Plaintiff's action was induced by an erroneous application of the law regarding viability of his termination claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 2000e and the law regarding quaulified immunity". Opening Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant at 13. We have carefully reviewed the record and the order of the district court dated November 15, 1990, in light of Martinez' arguments, and we are not persuaded that the district court erred.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Honorable Richard Owen, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
