Marty Lee Rorie, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charles M. Creecy; Ann Emery; Joel S. Evans, Defendants-appellees, 953 F.2d 639 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-90-484-CRT-BR)
Marty Lee Rorie, appellant pro se.
Jane Ray Garvey, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, K. K. HALL and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Marty Lee Rorie appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion partially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rorie v. Creecy, No. CA-90-484-CRT-BR (E.D.N.C. July 12, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
