Mid-ohio Communications, Inc., Appellant, v. Federal Communications Commission, Appellee, 946 F.2d 1565 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 946 F.2d 1565 (D.C. Cir. 1991) April 30, 1991

Appeal from the Federal Communications Commission.

Before BUCKLEY, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This case was heard on the record from the Federal Communications Commission and was briefed and argued by counsel. Though the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion, we have accorded them full consideration. See D.C. Cir. R. 14(c). On consideration thereof and substantially for the reasons set forth in the Commission's and the Review Board's decisions, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the court that the Commission's order appealed from herein be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15. This instruction to the clerk is without prejudice to the right of any party at any time to move for expedited issuance of the mandate for good cause shown.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.