Samuel v. Martinez, Petitioner-appellant, v. Lou Hesse, Gale A. Norton, Attorney General for the State Ofcolorado, Respondents-appellees, 943 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case

US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 943 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1991) Sept. 4, 1991

Before McKAY, SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT^*

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument.

For the reasons stated in the District Court's Order of January 2, 1991, including the Recommendation by U.S. Magistrate filed October 2, 1990, we AFFIRM.^** The mandate shall issue forthwith.

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Appellant's Motion for a Certificate of Probable Cause is granted. However, once appellant's appeal is considered on the merits, the order of the district court is affirmed

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.