Unpublished Disposition, 940 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 940 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Alan Robert JOSLIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-10362.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 15, 1991.* Decided July 18, 1991.

Before CHAMBERS and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER,**  District Judge.

ORDER

After careful review of the record in this case, we vacate the judgment of conviction, the sentence, and the plea of guilty upon which the conviction was based. We remand this case to the district court to permit the defendant to enter a new plea.

During defendant's plea hearing, the trial court violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and failed to inform defendant of the mandatory minimum penalty for his offense. The trial court also misstated the mandatory maximum penalty for the offense. These actions constitute reversible error. See United States v. Jaramillo-Suarez, 857 F.2d 1368, 1371 (9th Cir. 1988). The government has conceded that these errors did occur and that they warrant reversal.

Because we vacate defendant's conviction and sentence, we need not address the other issues argued on this appeal.

VACATED.


 *

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)

 **

Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.