In Re William Earl Carrow, Petitioner, 937 F.2d 602 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseOn Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-76-370-HM, CA-87-2561)
William Earl Carrow, petitioner pro se.
PETITION DENIED.
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
William Earl Carrow filed this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to expedite the disposition of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Shortly before this petition was filed the district court granted in part and denied in part his Sec. 2255 motion. His petition is therefore moot. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
