Leonard Carter, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Clarence L. Jackson, D.a.garraghty, B.i. Pinchbeck, Linda W. Galloway, C.w.fitzgerald, Defendants-appellees, 935 F.2d 1285 (4th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 935 F.2d 1285 (4th Cir. 1991) Submitted June 3, 1991. Decided June 20, 1991

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, District Judge. (CA-91-46-3)

Leonard Carter, appellant pro se.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Leonard Carter appeals from the district court order that he particularize his claim. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Murray, CA-91-46-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1991). We deny Carter's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.