Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Thomas J. Andrews, Defendant-appellee, 935 F.2d 1285 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C.Weston Houck, District Judge. (CA-88-1782-4-2)
Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appellant pro se.
William Reynolds Williams, Willcox, McLeod, Buyck, Baker & Williams, P.A., Florence, S.C., for appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals from the district court's order dismissing Burgess's claim of legal malpractice. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses Burgess failed to preserve a material factual dispute in response to defendant's summary judgment motion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's entry of summary judgment. Burgess v. Andrews, CA-88-1782-4-2 (D.S.C.Jan. 16, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
