Unpublished Disposition, 931 F.2d 59 (9th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseRaymond A. CHAMBERLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-15046.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 19, 1991.* Decided April 23, 1991.
Before POOLE, D.W. NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Raymond A. Chamberlin, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Chamberlin's complaint alleged numerous constitutional violations by various state agencies and officials. The district court's order explained the complaint's deficiencies, dismissed the complaint with prejudice in part and without prejudice in part, and granted leave to amend. Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 because the district court did not issue a final, appealable order. See Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi, 741 F.2d 1169, 1171 n. 1 (9th Cir. 1984) (" [A]n order dismissing a complaint but not dismissing the action is not appealable under section 1291").
DISMISSED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Chamberlin's request for oral argument is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
