Unpublished Disposition, 925 F.2d 1472 (9th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case

US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 925 F.2d 1472 (9th Cir. 1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Danny ROCHELLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-10259.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 4, 1991.^* Decided Feb. 6, 1991.

Before TANG, SCHROEDER and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Danny Rochelle appeals his sentence and his conviction, following a guilty plea, for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1).

Counsel for Rochelle filed, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), a brief stating that there were no issues that this court could review. Rochelle did not file a supplemental pro se brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.

The district court's judgment is therefore affirmed, and the motion of Randy Montesano, Esq., to withdraw as counsel of record is granted.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.