William Willis Schriefer, Petitioner-appellant, v. Warden, Patuxent Institute, Commissioner of Marylanddepartment of Corrections, Attorney General of Thestate of Maryland, Respondents-appellees, 924 F.2d 1053 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-90-2613-HAR)
William Willis Schriefer, appellant pro se.
D. Md.
DISMISSED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Willis Schriefer appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Schriefer v. Warden, CA-90-2613-HAR (D. Md. Oct. 18, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
