Phyllis Call, Widow of John Call, Petitioner, v. Gunther-nash Mining Construction, Director, Office Ofworkers' Compensation Programs, United Statesdepartment of Labor, Respondents, 915 F.2d 1563 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseOn Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (BRB Nos. 88-1791-BLA; 85-5831-BLA)
Phyllis Call, petitioner pro se.
William Henry Howe, Daniel Edward Durden, Loomis, Owen, Fellman & Howe, Washington, D.C., Rodger Pitcairn, Barbara J. Johnson, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Phyllis Call seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901 et seq. Our review of the record and the Board's decision and order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Call v. Gunther-Nash Mining, BRB Nos. 88-1791-BLA, 85-5831-BLA (Ben.Rev.Bd. Feb. 28, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
