Edward T. Dean, Plaintiff-appellant, v. J.s. Smith, W.v. Stearns, Jr., S.c. Jordan, J.h. Smyre, R.granger, Michael Murchison, Thomas Loflin, John E.carriker, Franklin L. Block, Defendants-appellees, 914 F.2d 1490 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-88-416-CRT)
Edward T. Dean, appellant pro se.
Johnny M. Loper, Raleigh, N.C., Douglas Fraser McIntosh, Crossley, Mcintosh & Prior, Wilmington, N.C., for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Edward T. Dean appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Dean v. Smith, CA-88-416-CRT (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although Dean did not waive his fourth amendment claims by pleading guilty, Haring v. Prosise, 462 U.S. 306 (1983), he has failed to allege facts demonstrating that the search was improper
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
