United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Roy Webber Tinder, Jr., Defendant-appellant, 911 F.2d 726 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CR No. 86-73-N)
Roy Webber Tinder, Jr., appellant pro se.
Susan Lynn Watt, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va., for appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Roy Webber Tinder, Jr. appeals from the district court's order which denied his Rule 35(a) motion to correct his sentence. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Tinder, CR-86-73-N (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 1990) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
