Unpublished Dispositionjohn L. Bryant, Individually and As Personal Representativeof the Estate of Johnny Ace Smith; Frances Small;sylvia Rudd, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Stuart C. Carlisle; James Culver; Federal Bureau Ofalcohol, Firearms and Tobacco; Drug Enforcementagency; Defendants-appellees,michelle Delduco, et al., Defendants, 905 F.2d 1537 (6th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 905 F.2d 1537 (6th Cir. 1990) June 18, 1990

Before MILBURN and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges; and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

The plaintiff appeals an order dismissing two individual defendants, the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, and Tobacco, and the Federal Drug Enforcement Agency in this civil rights action alleging violations of the Fourth Amendment. The defendants were dismissed from the action on grounds of sovereign immunity, failure to effect service, and failure to state a claim. A motion to dismiss the remaining defendants is pending in the district court.

In the absence of certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), an order which disposes of fewer than all parties involved is not appealable. William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101, 102 (6th Cir. 1978) (per curiam). In this case the order of which the plaintiff seeks review dismissed some, but not all, of the defendants. The district court did not certify the order as final pursuant to Rule 54(b). Further, an order granting absolute or qualified immunity is not immediately appealable. Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29 (6th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction.

It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b) (1), Local Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.