In Re Ahoto Taysir Mulazim, Petitioner, 905 F.2d 1530 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 905 F.2d 1530 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted May 7, 1990. Decided May 17, 1990

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Ahoto Taysir Mulazim, petitioner pro se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Ahoto Taysir Mulazim petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court (1) to allow him an opportunity to reply to documents filed by the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, (2) to file his amended complaint and require a response from defendants, and (3) to cease delaying action in the case. Our review of the proceedings conducted by the district court discloses no undue delay in the handling of Mulazim's Sec. 1983 action. We therefore deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.