Clarence N. Foxworth, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Montgomery County, Maryland; Montgomery County, Maryland,police Department; Montgomery County Marylandjudicial Department and District Court;maryland Attorney of State,defendants-appellees, 904 F.2d 699 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (C/A No. 90-73).
Clarence N. Foxworth, appellant pro se.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence N. Foxworth appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies.* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foxworth v. Montgomery County, C/A No. 90-73 (D. Md. Jan. 11, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Foxworth's complaint calls into question the validity of his arrest and is therefore subject to the exhaustion requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Hamlin v. Warren, 664 F.2d 29 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 911 (1982); see also Pressly v. Gregory, 831 F.2d 518 (4th Cir. 1987)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
